But we require to say that the submissions that were made in that respect failed completely to focus on the concept of authority and what was implied by that word. Mrs Thomas said: The stress of this caused me to dread the postman calling.. On 1 November, the day before signing the acceptance of the offer letter, the fraudsters, again representing themselves as Mr and Mrs Cheetham, wrote to CMC on writing paper headed with the address 34 Danube Street, Edinburgh to confirm that the monthly payments in the respect of the loan were affordable by them. The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. But I nonetheless I (sic) agree with Mr Berkley that the core problem sought to be addressed by the imposition of a warranty of authority is whether the person acting as agent did or did not have authority so to act.". Telefon: + 43 664 4167380 Email: office@herdz.at . The supposed agent will normally know whether he has the authority which he claims, or the ability to determine whether he has such authority; whereas any party dealing with him will not. Reference was also made in Judge Hegarty's judgment to the case of Bristol and West Building Society v Fancy and Jackson [1997] 4 All ER 582, Bowstead and Reynolds particularly at para 9-065, SEB Trygg and a number of other English authorities. Blemain agreeing to the original possession claim being thrown out. [22] It was argued before the Lord Ordinary on behalf of the reclaimers that those factual situations allowed the reclaimers, in each case, to sue the respondents for their losses on the basis that the respondents in each case had been in breach of their implied warranty of authority as agents. [39] We also agree with the secondary basis on which the Lord Ordinary rejected the claim based on the letter, viz that the pursuers could show no loss since the obligation to which the letter of obligation was ancillary, the standard security, was void. The defenders pleadings had been drawn up in such a way as to place in issue the existence of any statutory breach of duty under section 25 supra. All information will be held in accordance with data protection requirements. In the law of Scotland the legal foundation of the liability created is described by Gloag on Contract (2nd edition) at page 155 as: "The rule that the assertion of authority implies a contract that the authority exists is of general application". Registration is recorded at: https://register.fca.org.uk. SHERIFFDOM OF GLASGOW AND STRATHKELVIN AT GLASGOW. Please check and confirm that there is nothing that would adversely affect our security on any of the searches. Court cases. Removing or resetting your browser cookies will reset these preferences. In Elias & anor v Blemain Finance HHJ Keyser QC gave helpful guidance on the application of the allocation guidelines for the county court at CPR 26.7 & 26.8. kerala to delhi distance. FEC cases are listed alphabetically with links to summaries and (for some cases) court opinions and other documents. To pay the deposit on the new property, she borrowed from Blemain via an interest-only loan secured on her flat. The stated value is also relevant to the wider issue of proportionality when allocating the claim [16]. But the judgment did not back her on everything: it said that while Blemain failed to carry out checks regarding how the loan was to be funded in retirement, in breach of official guidance at the time, that does not automatically render the relationship unfair. The sum of 354,868 was transferred by CMC to Mellicks on 26 November 2004. They claimed she owed 52,000. Mr and Mrs Morgan signed the documents. We were referred to a modern English consideration of the topic in the case of Penn v Bristol and West Building Society and others [1997] 1 WLR 1356. Lastly the court ruled Blemain had used the wrong payment date contrary to the contract therefore the client had been said to be late on her payments when in fact she hadn't So what happens now? When the impostor was introduced to it as a prospective client, it carried out certain checks in order to satisfy itself that he was the person whom he represented himself to be, that he lived at the address at which he claimed to be living and that he was indeed the registered proprietor of the property at 17 Richards Place. The Defendant says that rescission as a remedy is fanciful in this case, that the Court will have to look at all the circumstances, that the borrowing was actually used for consolidation of other loans and that in reality what the Court will be doing is looking at an appropriate remedy probably of damages based on commission and charges most likely in the region of around 2,500. [16] Mr Allison also founded upon the case of Wilson. Mr and Mrs Morgan attended, as requested, on 23 November. LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. The offer letter was signed for acceptance on 2 November by "Mr and Mrs Cheetham". The details of the tenancy were in fact provided by Mr Morgan and sent to Mellicks under cover of a letter dated 4 November. In dealing with the scope of the warranty the judge at para 59 of his judgment stated: "The essential legal principles applicable to such a claim are not in doubt. In particular he cautioned against a blanket approach to automatically allocating a type of claim to a track without consideration of its particular merits. He had the opportunity to consider the evidence in its totality. Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. On 22 November Mr Longmuir sent Mellicks copies of the prior title deeds which he had obtained from Miller & Bryce. TORONTO, January 18, 2023--SPOT COFFEE (CANADA) LTD. (TSXV:SPP) ("SPoT Coffee" or the "Company") hereby refers to its news release dated October 12, 2021 whereby SPoT Coffee announced that its . The reclaimers' sole complaint was that the borrowers, having turned out not to be the owners of the subjects over which the reclaimers wished to have security for their lendings the respondents were in breach of their respective implied warranty of authority. In a subsequent telephone conversation on 23 November 2004 Messrs DM Hall confirmed the value of the subjects, if a sale had to be effected within 90 days, to be 575,000. It should be noted that that formulation of principle is but an example of what the courts in England and Wales and, during the 19th century, in the context of certain well known mercantile transactions, namely imply terms into them in the absence of their having been expressly excluded by the parties, to render the contract commercially sensible or workable. The facts found, in both actions, reveal a striking resemblance. Jane Charles is hoping her 15-year nightmare involving a costly interest-only loan may soon be over after a court ruled that some of the lenders terms and conditions were unfair. Have you had a loan with Blemain Finance? In connection with the pursuers first ground of appeal, Mr Allison made reference to the cases of, [8] Mr Allison criticised the sheriffs approach to interest on two levels. Please note we wish to take a 1st charge over the property. You can learn more detailed information in our Privacy Policy. Mr Allison maintained that the sheriff had indulged in speculation rather than relying upon the evidence. The judgment raises issues that could affect thousands of people, and is likely to be studied closely by other borrowers, including customers of other subprime lenders. Thanks for the referral PT2537. In relation to the CMC case we require to address the effect of the letter of obligation relied upon by the reclaimers in that case. I would be interested to know. The report stated that the property had been inspected on 2 November and the valuation was in the sum of 600,000. The court heard she had written to complain about the high level of interest, and that she said whatever she did, [Blemain] kept adding to her account. He noted that Messrs Mellicks had been acting for the lenders. We will take into account the relevant aspects of the decision specific to this case as we work with all parties to progress this matter.. The award of damages is entirely separate from any indebtedness said to be due to the defenders. This is not the case of a bare misstatement by a person not bound by any duty to give information. There are many people facing similar situations and this case illustrates that even the most complicated debt problems can be unravelled to secure a positive outcome.. These documents, the Lord Ordinary held, must have come to BFL in the first place from Mr and Mrs Morgan. The value of the property was noted as 600,000. EXTRA DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION, MORNA GRANDISON (JUDICIAL FACTOR ON THE ESTATE OF LONGMUIR & CO), Defenders and Respondents: A Young QC; Duncan; bto. BlemainFinance was also ordered to pay most of Mrs Thomas legal costs. In para 97 of his judgment Judge Hegarty said: "Excel carries on business in the financial sector, specialising in making short-term commercial loans. The case pitted Charles, a. The case pitted Charles, a 66-year-old from West Sussex, against Blemain Finance, part of a company with several thousand customers and a 4bn loan book. Blemain Finance Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority | Registered in England and Wales - Company Registration Number 01185052. He made no award of interest on that sum. The payment protection she had taken on two of the agreements only covered her for the first 12 months she was out of work and in total she received only 2,311.32 in repayments from the payment protection insurer, despite paying much more in premiums and interest. He explained that he wished to raise money and was keen to have the transaction completed quickly. The saga began in 2006, when Charles and her husband were looking to buy a house in Epsom, Surrey. At the start of this year it went down from 14.4% to 11.45%, reducing her monthly payment from 396 to 315. Once again, Ms Hamilton sought to challenge the detail and the quality of the evidence before the sheriff in support of a submission to the effect that absent evidence suggesting that a higher offer would have been submitted to the defenders had they taken other steps, no finding could be made against them in terms of section25. Reference was made to SEB Trygg. The judgment will be of interest to other Blemain customers, as well as those of other specialist mortgage and secured lending firms. they produced passports and utility bills to the solicitors to support their identity. These instructions were set out more fully in two letters of 30 November which Mr Cheetham left with Mr Longmuir's secretary in an envelope for passing to Mr Longmuir. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. In 2018, Blemain sought to enforce the possession order. On the same day Mellicks wrote to Longmuir & Co enclosing the standard security document together with a standing order mandate. Charles has so far paid back a total of almost 60,000 in interest, and there is still an outstanding debt of almost 45,000, even after the deduction. [34] The pursuers' contention is that the letter of obligation constituted a personal obligation assumed by the solicitors to deliver a land certificate issued by the Keeper of the Land Register of Scotland in favour of their clients as registered proprietors of the above subjects, which disclosed no entry, deed or diligence prejudicial to the pursuers' interest and disclosed the standard security granted in favour of the pursuers. She took out the loans for home improvements, debt consolidation and to purchase a car, with the amounts borrowed each time ranging from 5,000 to 10,000. Cheshire Mortgage Corporation Limited (CMC) and Blemain Finance Limited (Blemain) were both victims of separate mortgage frauds. The Criminal Division is administratively divided into four branches: Case Management, Special Proceedings, Quality Assurance, and Courtroom Support. In 2018, Blemain tried to revive the old suspended possession order, and a few months later Charles was given permission to bring a counterclaim in which she claimed several of the terms were unfair and there had been breaches of the loan agreement. He did not accept that the discrepancies in the figures were merely mistakes. By submitting your information you confirm you voluntarily choose to contact us via this website. Please revert this information back to us.". Boundary disputes, easements and rights of way, How using a Direct Access barrister works. [37] Although the obligation assumed in the Cheshire Mortgage letter of obligation was much wider, both in terms of its duration and the content of the obligation, than is normally the case, it was plainly written and delivered as a letter of obligation ancillary to the mortgage transaction being settled on the date of its delivery. He had held that any entitlement to interest flowing from the wrongful withholding of 10,000 as from the date of sale, viz. Details of the short assured tenancy she said would be forwarded to them as soon as possible. If there are doubts as to the realistic value of the claim then there is a mechanism in CPR 26.5(3) to require the claimant to justify their value [17]. [36] The peculiarities of the Cheshire Mortgage letter do not end with the terms in which the obligation is stated. [17] In any event, in determining these appeals, I require to recognise that in presiding over the proof the sheriff had the advantage of having seen and heard the witnesses involved. Compare SEB Trygg and compare Frank Houlgate Investment Co Limited v Biggart Baillie LLP 2010 SLT 527 at paras 27-28. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads. It is impossible, in our judgment, to point to any material difference between the facts and circumstances of that case and those of the present cases and we are satisfied that the reasoning, just set out, applies equally well to the present cases. He informed the court that he did not make it a requirement that new clients should show this to him before he started work on their behalf, but made it clear that they would require to be produced at some point during any work being carried out by him for them. Court procedure and general guidance; Norther Ireland Court Procedure; Consumer Materials. It was a terrible deal [but] at the time I really needed that 30,000, Charles tells Guardian Money. In particular on 17 November, Mr Longmuir wrote to Mellicks enclosing for their examination extracts (i) of the disposition in favour of Mr and Mrs Cheetham recorded in the Register of Sasines on 28 June 1989 and (ii) of the discharge by the building society in favour of Mr and Mrs Cheetham recorded in that Register on 24 April 1995. . The client opening form, completed by Mr Longmuir in manuscript on that day, showed the full names of those for whom he thought he was acting, namely Christopher Paul Cheetham and Juliet Cheetham, and it gave their address 34 Danube Street, Edinburgh, EH4 1NT. Recent decisions lists contain the 20 most recently rendered court judgments for each BAILII court/tribunal database, in reverse chronological order. On 11 November Ms Sinclair wrote to Mr and Mrs Morgan asking them to come to her office to sign the standard security and other documents. It might be argued that, when it comes to the issue of interest, the pursuers third ground of appeal is somewhat tautologous. It is Blemain's case that they relied on that valuation to loan the owners of the property, Mr and Mrs Sherman, 250,000 by way of a second mortgage. If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here. You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here. High street lenders were not prepared to give them a mortgage for the full amount they required, and they needed to raise an extra 30,000 for the deposit. [29] In the Excel Securities case Judge Hegarty QC, sitting in the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice, Manchester District Registry Mercantile Court reviewed this area of law in a comprehensive and careful decision. VAT number: 144 4752 12. It is noteworthy, indeed, that no such claim is made in the Blemain case where a similar letter of obligation was granted. Clicking the Accept All button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies (check the full list). The purpose of the loan was said "to assist the purchase of overseas property". I enclose a separate letter of instruction in this regard signed by myself and my wife". [4] When it came to Mr Dougans evidence, no similarly qualified witness was called on behalf of the defenders and, consequently, there was no contradictor, so to speak. 2. They made an application for a loan on or about 20 October 2004, initially through a broker. For my part, I can see no justification why risks of this kind should be transferred from the shoulders of a commercial concern such as Excel on to those of a professional firm such as BM Solicitors.". The figure of 600,000 was noted by him in brackets on the form. In summary the key principles when allocating claims to a track in the county court are [references in brackets are to the paragraphs of judgment]: Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. His decision is the subject of an appeal by the pursuer and a cross-appeal on behalf of the defenders. These propositions clearly focus on the conduct of the agent involving an expressed or implied representation by him that he has authority to act for the principal he says he is acting for in the transaction he is entering into with the third party. Having done so, it decided to proceed with the proposal and enter into a transaction with the impostor, albeit on the mistaken footing that his name was James Charles Whittaker Golding, the owner of the property in question. [23] The Lord Ordinary proceeded to absolve both sets of respondents from the conclusions of the summons in each case. Complaints Procedure | After the hearing, the judge ruled that the clause in the agreement relating to changes to the interest rate was unfair, and therefore not binding on Charles, for a number of reasons. He also advised the secretary that payment of the funds was to be made electronically to "Elmwood Contracts". The third ground of appeal for the defenders also fails. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. If the principal proves unreliable, that is something in respect of which the third party could have made inquiries. Court Procedure. Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features. To do so risks summarily judging the value of the claim. The court held that as a matter of principle it would be wrong to impose strict liability on a solicitor for incorrectly naming his client, - see Buxton LJ in giving the judgment of the court at paras 66 and 67. The defenders pleas in law exclusively concerned the merits of the action and the relevancy etc of the pursuers averments. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Significantly the reclaimers accepted that in each case the security transaction had been conducted according to normal good practice. He had not given much thought to why Mr Hone had not resorted to more conventional forms of . By Mike Scarcella. That was a person identifying himself by the name of James Charles Whittaker Golding and claiming to be the registered proprietor of the property at 17 Richards Place. Your choice regarding cookies on this site, Succession & estate planning for business owners, Partnership agreements & limited liability partnerships, Directive on security & network information systems, Privacy & electronic communications regulations, Claims against HM Courts & Tribunal Services, Care home fees and planning for the future. [19] In contrast, the arguments advanced by Mr Allison in furtherance of the second ground of appeal for the pursuer were, in my view, well-founded. She required both Mr and Mrs Morgan to attend Balfour and Manson's offices for the purposes of showing identification documents in the form of a passport or driving licence and a utility bill confirming their address. [13] On 26 November Messrs Mellicks wrote to Longmuir & Co enclosing the formal offer of loan together with the acceptance form which required to be signed and returned to them along with the standard security document and the standing order mandate. The reclaimers in each action now reclaim against those decisions of the Lord Ordinary. The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". [17] In any event, in determining these appeals, I require to recognise that in presiding over the proof the sheriff had the advantage of having seen and heard the witnesses involved. Mr Morgan asked Ms Sinclair to put in place a standard security over 3 Mentieth View, Dunblane which he said he owned jointly with his wife. [5] In advancing the appeal for the pursuer, Mr Allison challenged the manner in which the sheriff had arrived at the figure of 160,000. This is a relevant consideration in applying CPR 26.8(1)(b) [20-21]. Our specialist solicitors deal with everything from medical negligence claims,personal injury claims,driving offences, family law,divorce lawandresidential conveyancing toprofessional discipline, employment law,corporatelaw, regulatory lawand commercial property. [12] Under reference to the second ground of appeal for the defenders, Ms Hamilton made much of the significance of comparables in the context of Mr Dougans evidence. At page 1361 Waller LJ giving the judgment of the court cited the following from Chitty on Contracts: Specific contracts, 27 ed (1994), Vol 2 page 61, para 31-093: "One who expressly or impliedly warrants that he has the authority of another is liable in contract for breach of warranty of authority to any person to whom the warranty is made and who suffers damage by acting in the faith of it, if in fact he had no such authority. Registered office: Cornelius House, 178-180 Church Road, Hove, East Sussex BN3 2DJ. Bridging Finance Limited | Registered in England and Wales - Company Registration Number 03166982 Blemain Finance Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority | Registered in England and Wales - Company Registration Number 01185052. In particular there is nothing in principle in the law of contract to prevent an agent from guaranteeing to a third party that he has a principal who is the same person as appears on property registers, for example, as the owner of a specific property. For her part, Charles says she just wants to get this whole thing sorted and put it behind me its been a total nightmare. that the sheriff had erred in failing to award interest to the pursuer. That last mentioned case was not, in the event, cited to the court by either side. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. The lenders sued the solicitors for their loss on the grounds, inter alia, of breach of warranty authority "as to the identity" of their clients. The respondent in the CMC action is the judicial factor appointed to the estates of a firm of solicitors known as Longmuir & Co who acted in the security transaction to which the action at the instance of CMC relates. We use cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience.