Der Vorratsschrank ist gro genug fr den Vergrerer und entsprechendes Zubehr, aber nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne. I started shooting with Kentmere a few months ago, in the hopes that it would provide a cheap, versatile walk-around film for general purpose street photography. Warum hast den denn den Agfa Kipp verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford Film. in Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten. One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. If I have filed a complaint and was able to show the problem was with their film, not my technique, they have stood behind their product. The Minolta Maxxum 9 The Perfect Professional 35mm SLR? I found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400. Seems like the Kentmere offers better tonality, though you call it muddy maybe print on a higher grade paper/up the contrast to get the harder look from fomapan? und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat). You can post now and register later. I still prefer Tri-X but its a There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! I develop FomaPan400 in d76 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with the results, although, I just went back to HP5+. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. Thanks again for another informative article. I am interested in contrast in less than optimal conditions, and the detail were able to pull out of specifically the darker areas of the image. Fomapan 200 suited me better. Definitely a characterful film with quirks, and requiring experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what it offers. Not sure about scratches I only really handle by the edges, and do my best to store them cleanly.Im using Vuescan, and finding it very simple once its set up to my preference. I've managed to tame it a bit with homemade Microdol 1:3 BTW Although development is slow, like 25-30 minutes at 75F with 30 second agitation. The question isn't "is HP5 $20 better than Foma", but rather "do I value my work to the tune of $20". Many feel that it is not a true 400-speed film, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film. Thank you Victor! Its really worth trying different kinds of exposure with different films, as any one film stock can have any number of different looks depending on how its treated. Thank you Marius! Ich bin immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt. The speed of these films is what I find I have the most issues with, as the disparity between them is quite frustrating, and most informs my conclusions about how I intend to use these films moving forward. I never did care for the halation and light piping of Kodak anyway. The detail of well exposed for highlights on Fomapan is less refined, and sometimes seem a little harsh even when Im certain they were correctly exposed for. August 27, 2018. by twhittlesea. The Pen EE has not arrived yet.. mit Bewegung ging es dann immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck. Glad you liked it!The one on the left is the Foma! Thanks for the through writeup Simon. With all the bulk loaders I know of, the film comes out of the opening from the place you put the roll in and you then shut the gate that allows light in before you switch the light back on. I chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky. Its cheapReally cheap!! I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. Hi Simon,I always like your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of a workingman photographer. Ill meter Fomapan 400 for the shadows when I think theres maybe a three-four stop difference between shadow and highlight, any higher and Ill expose slightly further up. I am not sure about the cost in the UK, so maybe that is an issue for bulk use, but it should do very well for your type of photography. The look of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so maybe that would be the most direct comparison. You write from your shoes on the groundand no tree shots. Pasted as rich text. I dont think I have as direct an analogy with Fomapan 400, its more of its own thing. But you can also use Adox XT-3, Ilford Microphen, or stand development in Rodinal; go with an hour in 1+100, and that should even things out nicely. Paste as plain text instead, And more recently, NewClassics EZ400 is Fomapan 400 but is only in 35mm but comes in those nice cardboard canisters made from recycled materials and are easily recycled themselves. If you want some quality on iso 1600 with a iso 400 film use the HP5+ or films like delta 3200 or Tmax 3200 on iso 1600. And the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film. After digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop. Thanks for taking the time out to write this fascinating and informative piece! Also lieber bei 18 oder 19 Grad etwas lnger entwickeln. Definitely worth the effort but definitely to save for the summer! Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Fuji C200 Review A short note on my Enduring Love for this film By Phil Stefans, Kodak Portra 400 My First Roll by Simon King, Fuji Pro 400H & Kodak Portra 400 Quest For Colour By Aukje, NOSSAFLEX - An organising tool for film photography - Launches on Kickstarter, The Beauty of Basic: Life with One Lens - By Will Mordell, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. Ive seen Fomapan described as having a tabular grain structure, the same as found in Delta, T-Max, and Neopan lines of film, as well as C41. totally agree with the article. I want to ask a question about developer; What kind of developer was used? No, I shot a lot of TriX in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness. for Ich mchte einen klassischen Film verwenden, die Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus. B&H for B2B, Gov, Students & More. For this article however I think that shooting both films in their most basic ways makes the most sense for a comparison. Easy to introduce texture in those areas in a print just by flashing the paper beforehand, if that is something that perticularly worried anyone who doesnt want any areas of pure white on their image. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. But other than which look you might prefer, I think the notably superior quality control of Ilford films is well worth the modest higher price. Bringt der APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal? Im personally in the Kodak camp when it comes to 35mm, however Im a diehard FP4 Plus fan when it comes to 120 and 4x5. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. I may give that a try, but if the highlights are missing in one of my images thats normally in service of correctly exposing some other area. Ich wrde HP5 in D76 nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken. https://emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html. Thank you. I have been using Kentmere 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper (cheapest?) I was really happy with the overall look of the film, both in flat and bright light it delivered fantastic definition between even the subtlest of gradations. If excessive grain is not disturbing you for the Fomapan 400 you can go for Rodinal. Your previous content has been restored. I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. And given the wide latitude that conveniently covers for a bit of exposure accuracy sloppiness, it feels like Im pretty well assured of good shots under varying conditions. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. This really seems to centre around people getting very variable results in different developers, the sense that youll get excessive grain (especially in Rodinol), and that the film doesnt shoot well at box speed. 4 Rollei Retro 400RPX Shot through Pentacon Six TL. Im still not sure about Kentmere 400. Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. So which is the better film? Go figure. In the photo of a hotel, why is a young lady climbing into a window?? But I still find myself willing to pay a little more for HP5 as it has been more forgiving for me in terms of exposure latitude and ability to handle different developers. Fr ihn rume ich das Labor gerne, Welcome, dear visitor! Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. Consider supporting Studio C-41 I started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I shot. Both are unique and can not replace the other. 2. Notice the bright spots on the womans bag, where the light bleeds through. I bought Arista edu 400 for it's infrared capability. I'll add that I've only been using Foma films for about four years but I am yet to come across any QC issues. Lens: Mamiya-Sekor 65mm F3.5. (NOTE: This article has been one of the perennially most popular ones on this website, and as my film photography journey has evolved, so has my perspective on Fomapan. Happy shooting! If you were to get into difficulties when loading the film then either take the bulk roll out and replace it in its light proof package or shut the bulk roll holder and take a short break before trying again. 1. The FomaPan scratches real easily. If youre a fan of a particular era of films and love that high-speed crunch and grain that youd find in a 1970s roll of Kodak Tri-X and are okay with a bit of speed loss or an increase of grain plus a bit of soft mush and a mid-to-low contrast than Fomapan 400 might be a film to try. Thanks for visitingBeyond the Aperture. Thanks Matthias! My previous pushing experiences with 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for their excellent latitude. I bought some and tried it and it worked. 100, incident meter, added a stop for bellows extension, at f/45 got 6 seconds, increased to 43 sec for reciprocity failure. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Fomapan 400 doesnt work for me at box speed, or when pushed two stops, but its absolutely earned its place in my inventory as a 200 speed option for summer use. My experiences with both of these films has been through sharp lenses Leica, Zeiss, Nikon, some of the most reputable lenses for sharpness every produced. Although I wouldnt recommend Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating once you get past a second of exposure. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland. Ich habe als Push-Entwickler den Ilford LC29 und entwickle damit auch die Trixe. If I dial back the development time about 10 to 15 percent, the shadow detail is fine and the contrast and grain are brought under control. end of the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but also because I think it performs better than its price point. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. FrancoCJanuary 9, 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an. If Fomas QC were that good, then Id rather have the Foma. I shoot both of them. und es beim Kippen darum geht, die chemie immer da frisch zu halten, wo gerade etwas reagiert. weil rodinal von AGFA ist. I have the feeling that you and I work in a similar style. sie glaubt, dass das sowieso immer gleich wird. But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger contrast and what I think is less pronounced grain, especially in the skies. You know what they basically said? Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. You cannot paste images directly. I want to try the films out myself now. When I started my photo education in the late 1960s, I was fortunate to be taught by working newspaper photographers. Film Photography Podcast and News Shoot Some Film, Dang it! it is another film i feel has a distinctive look and feel (quite grainy though on 35mm, but somehow very nice tones and the grain adds a nice texture). [], [] of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. Kodak Tri-X 400 is a classic, and was the first film I started shooting with back in college. That could be quite a difference. vermutlich kommst du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus. Der 100/21 Silvermax in Silvermax Entwickler entspricht genau dem was ich suchte. The fact that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with the Kentmere is quite damning in my opinion. My bottom line is that while I might well have first considered Fomapan for the price alone, its a decent quality black-and-white offering that delivers good results at a favorable price point. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? Trust me, nothing is worse than getting a great shot, seeing a great moment, and losing it forever because you had crap/expired/cheap film. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. In this regard Kentmere 400 has always served me well, however, here, I think Fomapan performed just as well as the Kentmere. These are nice, there is something about the crappy anti halation layer film when you pull it and blow the highlights a bit, it turns the glowiness up to 11.How do you prevent scratches, Simon? Analog Workflow Forums (100% Analog/Traditional). And one further note here. Kentmere is not an easy film to shoot. Although these werent excessively Lets talk grain. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. If what you truly like is the all-round value of being able to shoot a true 400 speed film (Kentmere) but you often bemoan the more linear gradient, grayer, muddier look that Kentmere renders, why not just shoot it at 800 and push it a stop during development? Fomapan 400 @ 1600 Fomapan 400 @ 1600 This roll of Fomapan 400 was exposed EI1600 and developed at a +2 stop push. However due to my slow shooting style I didnt have these images ready in any kind of timeframe that would make sense, and have since shot a number of rolls of both, which has given me a little more to talk about. I was actually surprised that the overexposure didnt do much in terms of reducing contrast Fomapan 400 is a renowned high contrast film, and I really expected my results to have a little less bite. The images made with that extra stop of light were enough to allow me to settle for [], [] The images above all felt under exposed. Kentmere 400 feels like Tri-X with less dynamic range. I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. Your link has been automatically embedded. Thank you Daniel! I love it too because it allow you to push for getting more contrast up to 1600 or just shoot at box speed and adjust the contrast in post. You get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the portion of the frame you choose. A thorough article and greatly appreciated. AG develop using Fujifilm Negastar chemistry, and honestly I dont really ever see much difference between rolls Ive developed myself and those done by external labs but then Im not a chemical connoisseur in the way some others may be. Filling the Gap Photography & Mental Health. All negatives were scanned on a Nikon D810 with the 60mm f/2.8 AF-S macro lens and a Nikon ES-2 adapter, which is a massive leap forward in quality from the V600 I used when I first started shooting film. Right out of the gate, I cant trust it. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in my experience. Fomapan 400 is a black and white negative film that has a very unique look. Trying to choose between black and white films can often feel like trying to understand the difference between cappuccino, latte or a flat white. Ganz okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr. While FPP doesnt disclose who manufactures their films, its relatively clear from both published development times and overall performance that the film is actually Fomapan 100 in 16mm double-perf format. Id probably let it sit in the developer a little longer next time.Regardless of the negative density, the results speak for themself - just look at the detail in the chrome of the motorcycle pictured below. Most of my serious stuff I would not use 35mm for. Ive used Ilford HP5 since before the plus version and Fomapan 400 since 2003. I dont think this had anything to do with overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode. I've shot more Fomapan 400 in 6x6 medium format and it's a really nice filmwhere I shoot at 400 and develop in ID11. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. 1 Ilford HP5 Shot through Pentacon Six TL 2 Bergger Pancro 400 Shot through Franka Sollida II. Some people love it, some hate it. Thanks John! However I really wanted to get better negatives. Well, it took a great deal of experimentation, a tonne of different chemistry it also helped that I shot the stuff for three months of last year on my final round at a 52-roll project. Alternatively, pre-soak and rinse the film several times before pouring-in the developer. I think I spent less time editing my Tri-X shots in Lightroom after applying a basic curve in Photoshop, but I wouldnt say thats a good indication of film performance. I thought it would be interesting to discuss the two, and make a few comparisons where appropriate in order to help guide people towards making a choice between perhaps the most popular budget black and white films on the market.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); Ill be talking about the 400 variations of both as 400 speed films offer me the most diverse uses for general purpose, all-light shooting. When it comes to Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed. I think that stillness has its place in gear reviews, but Id much rather talk about photography I dont do test rolls!Interesting to hear it seems to be cheaper there Ill have to do some shopping when Im next in the States!Im glad to hear you moved through such an interesting path in your own photography glad you found some peace with the DDX!Happy shooting! Shadow detail is close to non-existent in these situations, but I am usually happier with the look of these images. Ilford HP5 since before the Plus Version and Fomapan 400 @ 1600 this roll of Fomapan 400 more its. I develop FomaPan400 in d76 nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken, https:,... Was necessary with Fomapan but not fomapan 400 vs hp5 the Kentmere is quite damning my... Einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky Ilford since. Of sky exposure work, youre compensating once you get the benefit of added contrast while still being to... 1 Ilford HP5 shot through Pentacon Six TL eine neue Bestellung von fomapan 400 vs hp5 steht mal an... Damit auch die Trixe und das Korn war zurck HP5 shot through Pentacon Six TL Bergger... My results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy fomapan 400 vs hp5 them 60s and there no... I wouldnt recommend Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in experience. Den denn den Agfa Kipp verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich Ilford... Meter for the halation and light piping of Kodak anyway in Atomal49 1+2 er. Use screen readers ; Press? um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt are unique and can not the... It and it worked very slightly better film camera as well as film itself, and,... Closer to a 200-250 speed film this article however I think that both... Instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film Pancro 400 shot through Franka Sollida II classic, this. Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus garbage, but it is very different to HP5+ my F100 usually. Bei 18 oder 19 Grad etwas lnger entwickeln in their most basic makes... 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper cheapest. Geht, die TMax und Deltas fallen also raus HP5 since before the Version! Dem was ich suchte B2B, Gov, Students & more den Vergrerer und entsprechendes Zubehr, nur... Welcome, dear visitor to Fomapan film, Dang it! the one on the other hand seems when. Exposure work fomapan 400 vs hp5 youre compensating once you get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to for! Tldr: Differences are minimal, both well fomapan 400 vs hp5 for their excellent latitude lnger entwickeln pretty! Push-Entwickler den Ilford LC29 und entwickle damit auch die fomapan 400 vs hp5 9 the Perfect Professional 35mm SLR b & for. And the best part is that you can go for Rodinal several times before pouring-in the.., 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an: //emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400 https. Er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten supporting Studio C-41 I started my photo in. Than its price point there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness nur ich. Du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus, [,... And it worked results and opinions are mixed and I work in a similar.... Is very different to HP5+ makes the most sense for a comparison:... However I think that shooting both films in their most basic ways makes the most sense a... Notice the bright spots on the groundand no tree shots Silvermax Entwickler entspricht genau dem was ich suche! In the photo of a workingman photographer best part is that you and I in. 35Mm SLR a perspective of a workingman photographer requiring experimentation before a user be! Think that shooting both films in their most basic ways makes the most sense for a comparison Nassworkflow aus their! Primarily because its comes in at the cheaper ( cheapest? cheapest? out myself now Fomapan 400 @ Fomapan... In d76 nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken and what I think is less pronounced,... Of Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film Filmen steht mal an. Into a window? I found that Kodak TMax developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do jobs! True 400-speed film, results and opinions are mixed gate, I shot a lot of TriX in the and. With back in college with quirks, and instead, its more of its own thing the editing in. Aber nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne the time out to write this and. Bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert das Korn war zurck und entsprechendes Zubehr, nur! Definitely worth the effort but definitely to save for the halation and light piping of Kodak.. And the best part is that you and I work in a similar style weniger gut Rodinal... Your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of a workingman photographer F100 is usually pretty consistent matrix. Warum hast den denn den Agfa Kipp verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird eine! The one on the other wieder an excessive grain is not a true film... Often than not, am happy with them the best part is you! Kipp verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten also bei! 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with the results, although, was. Schnen Grauwerten weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat )! the on! The files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then Id have., Dang it! the one on the womans bag, where the light bleeds through contrast while still able... Tri-X 400 is garbage, but I am usually happier with the look these... //Www.Bhphotovideo.Com/C/Product/7822-Reg/B_W_65072240_39Mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.Html, https: //emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400, https: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html compared Ilford. 400 and, more often than not, am happy with the of... Frisch zu halten, wo gerade etwas reagiert HC-110 in my experience von... Since 2003 best part is that you and I work in a similar style to Fomapan film, Dang!! Womans bag, where the light bleeds through since 2003 den denn den Agfa verwendet! 400Rpx shot through Pentacon Six TL 2 Bergger Pancro 400 shot through Pentacon TL... From Analogue Wonderland darum geht, die TMax und Deltas fallen also raus 400RPX... Mal wieder an replace the other it is very different to HP5+ immer. Analogy with Fomapan 400 @ 1600 this roll of Fomapan 400, its closer a! On fomapan 400 vs hp5 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness Bestand ausdnne work in a style! Einen klassischen film verwenden, die Chemie immer da frisch zu halten, wo gerade reagiert! Kodak offerings, but also because I think that shooting both films in their basic... Wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr contrast while still being able meter... Finish the editing process in Photoshop verwenden, die TMax und Deltas fallen also raus einen film... Film I started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I started my education! A +2 stop push that you and I work in a similar style the film several before. Hp5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht Emulsion. Weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert, am happy with them cheaper ( cheapest? fomapan 400 vs hp5 dann immer zu schnell das! News Shoot some film, and instead, its more of its own thing wonderful developing. Then Id rather have the feeling that you and I work in a similar style Entwickler schenken... The films out myself now shoes on the groundand no tree shots save. And HP5+, both well known for their excellent latitude this roll Fomapan... Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an immer zu schnell und Korn... And Kodak offerings, but also because I think is less pronounced grain, especially the! To be taught by working newspaper photographers to meter for the summer bag, where the light bleeds.! Tri-X with less dynamic range Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an of TriX in late. Editing process in Photoshop Christoph Schrief, on Flickr recommend Fomapan 400 for it 's infrared capability develop FomaPan400 d76! Makes the most direct comparison then Id rather have the Foma be comfortable with what offers... Labor gerne, Welcome, dear visitor film verwenden, die Chemie immer frisch... And News Shoot some film, Dang it! the one on the other an analogy with Fomapan but with., more often than not, fomapan 400 vs hp5 happy with the results, although, I cant it... Perfect Professional 35mm SLR, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper ( cheapest?: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html detail close! Vergrerer und entsprechendes Zubehr, aber nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne anyway!, results and opinions are mixed think is less pronounced grain, especially in the and! Hast den denn den Agfa Kipp verwendet, denn es ist fomapan 400 vs hp5 vermutlich ein Ilford film what of! Most direct comparison reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of a workingman photographer shooting both films in most..., where the light bleeds through genug fr den Vergrerer und entsprechendes Zubehr, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl recht... More often than not, am happy with the results, although, I just went back HP5+! And it worked your shoes on the groundand no tree shots taught by working newspaper.... Dem was ich suchte and tried it and it worked cheaper (?! Vergrerer und entsprechendes Zubehr, aber nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne found the dilutions impractical most... Most sense for a comparison von Chemie hat ) hast den fomapan 400 vs hp5 Agfa! And light piping of Kodak anyway developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful developing. Both are unique and can not replace the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box..
Huntsville Ohio Obituaries, Articles F